aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Ryujinx.Graphics.Gpu/Image/TextureGroup.cs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorgdkchan <gab.dark.100@gmail.com>2023-01-17 01:13:24 -0300
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2023-01-17 05:13:24 +0100
commit86fd0643c26433362a25acceb4fa1fcee07dd0b2 (patch)
tree8d12fb6b0629c195a0a3c1014f46cfe8f22cd3e6 /Ryujinx.Graphics.Gpu/Image/TextureGroup.cs
parent43a83a401ea8101bf6d001fe6fe188e1c106245e (diff)
Implement support for page sizes > 4KB (#4252)1.1.568
* Implement support for page sizes > 4KB * Check and work around more alignment issues * Was not meant to change this * Use MemoryBlock.GetPageSize() value for signal handler code * Do not take the path for private allocations if host supports 4KB pages * Add Flags attribute on MemoryMapFlags * Fix dirty region size with 16kb pages Would accidentally report a size that was too high (generally 16k instead of 4k, uploading 4x as much data) Co-authored-by: riperiperi <rhy3756547@hotmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Ryujinx.Graphics.Gpu/Image/TextureGroup.cs')
-rw-r--r--Ryujinx.Graphics.Gpu/Image/TextureGroup.cs8
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Ryujinx.Graphics.Gpu/Image/TextureGroup.cs b/Ryujinx.Graphics.Gpu/Image/TextureGroup.cs
index c167dc0d..896e11a5 100644
--- a/Ryujinx.Graphics.Gpu/Image/TextureGroup.cs
+++ b/Ryujinx.Graphics.Gpu/Image/TextureGroup.cs
@@ -1420,6 +1420,14 @@ namespace Ryujinx.Graphics.Gpu.Image
/// <param name="size">The size of the flushing memory access</param>
public void FlushAction(TextureGroupHandle handle, ulong address, ulong size)
{
+ // If the page size is larger than 4KB, we will have a lot of false positives for flushing.
+ // Let's avoid flushing textures that are unlikely to be read from CPU to improve performance
+ // on those platforms.
+ if (!_physicalMemory.Supports4KBPages && !Storage.Info.IsLinear && !_context.IsGpuThread())
+ {
+ return;
+ }
+
// There is a small gap here where the action is removed but _actionRegistered is still 1.
// In this case it will skip registering the action, but here we are already handling it,
// so there shouldn't be any issue as it's the same handler for all actions.